iStock.com/Makalish
Women Need Biosimilars
There are more affordable medicines than what's on the market — but most of us can't access them
Dec 29, 2020
Mar 13, 2024
Women's Health PolicyFounder and President of Institute for Women’s Health Strategies
CEO, Alliance of Sleep Apnea Partners
Monica Mallampalli, Ph.D. is a trained biomedical scientist and brings a unique perspective to women’s health — from science and research to policy and advocacy. Dr. Mallampalli considers herself a women’s health advocate. Using the lens of sex and gender differences, she has brought attention to knowledge gaps in science and policy in several areas of women’s health, including chronic pain, sleep health, cardiovascular health, musculoskeletal health, autoimmune disease, mental health, breast cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, urological health and clinical trials. Dr. Mallampalli has authored many research papers and opinion articles, and has been interviewed by the media on multiple occasions.
Previously, Dr. Mallampalli served as the senior scientific advisor at HealthyWomen, where she brought national attention to women and chronic pain, and she now serves as the chair of HealthyWomen’s chronic pain advisory council, which she established in 2020. Prior to HealthyWomen, Dr. Mallampalli served as the vice president of scientific affairs at the Society for Women’s Health Research (SWHR). Dr. Mallampalli has also worked at the National Institutes of Health as a Health policy analyst and as a research fellow. She obtained her post-doctoral fellowship at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine’s Department of Cell biology.
She earned her Ph.D. at the University of Utah in Human Genetics and received a Master of Sciences with a concentration in biochemistry from Osmania University in India. Dr. Mallampalli is the founder and CEO of the Institute for Women’s Health Strategies focused on applying data-driven strategies and solutions to advance and improve the science of women’s health. Currently, she serves as the executive Director at the Alliance of Sleep Apnea Partners (ASAP).
Full BioLearn about our editorial policies
There are more affordable medicines than what's on the market — but most of us can't access them
Medications exist that could cut costs, expand treatment options, and potentially save lives — but you can't access most of them.
They're called biosimilars, and they're medicines that have no clinically meaningful differences from biological medicines, also called reference products or biologics. These medicines are derived from living microorganisms, animal cells or plants and are used to treat a range of conditions from breast cancer to autoimmune diseases. Although subtle differences may exist between biosimilars and their biologic counterparts, studies have shown that those differences don't impact the safety or efficacy of the drugs.
The biggest difference between biosimilars and reference drugs may be their vastly different price points.
According to the RAND Corporation, a public policy nonprofit organization, biosimilars could introduce competition in the pharmaceutical marketplace by reducing spending by $54 billion by 2026.
HealthyWomen has taken an active role in discussing how biosimilars impact women's health. Last October, we gathered experts together to discuss biosimilars in Washington, DC. And this November, I gave a presentation at a public meeting hosted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on the reauthorization of the Biosimilar User Fee Act (BsUFA). First authorized in 2017, the act allows the FDA to continue a program that provides resources to review new biosimilars and encourages the development of biosimilars that may deliver safe, effective and affordable treatments for women who need them the most.
Without reauthorization, BsUFA will expire in September 2022.
We can not allow this to happen.
Europe pioneered the use of biosimilars in 2006, and they started slowly gaining traction in the United States three years later, in 2009. That's when Congress created the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCI Act) to increase competition in the pharmaceutical marketplace. Five years have passed since the FDA approved the United State's first biosimilar, Sandoz's Zarxio, which reduces the risk of infection in patients receiving strong chemotherapy that can cause a low white blood cell count.
Some of the diseases treated by biosimilars disproportionately impact women. For example, midlife women bear the biggest burden of chronic conditions such as breast cancer and autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, which can be treated by biosimilars.
To date, the FDA has approved 28 biosimilars, but only a few of them are currently available on the market. And it's more than marketing tactics keeping them from getting there. Although they were manufactured to increase market competition and meaningfully decrease the price of expensive biologics, some makers of reference medications have delayed their entry to market by entering litigation that claims biosimilars infringe on patents that protect biologics.
To date, nearly every biosimilar manufacturer faces, or has faced, such legal action. This has big repercussions for consumers who need options for less expensive medications. Hadlima, for example, a biosimilar to Humira that treats arthritis, plaque psoriasis and Crohn's disease, among other health conditions, can't be sold in the United States because of ongoing litigation and patent issues.
And even when biosimilars do make it to the market, due to the high costs of litigation, makers of these medications can't lower their costs as much as expected, which means they haven't yet lived up to the goal of the BPCI Act to increase market competition and substantially decrease prices. Without increased competition, biologics and the few biosimilars that have come to market continue to be among the most expensive drugs available, making it difficult for many women to afford them.
In 2018, the FDA published its Biosimilars Action Plan (BAP) for the purpose of "balancing innovation and competition." BAP not only acknowledged the FDA's important role in increasing access to biosimilars, but it also recognized barriers to increasing both the development and adoption of these drugs, including the need to increase public awareness.
In addition, the FDA has identified education as a necessary factor to the successful development and adoption of biosimilars, and it has done a fantastic job creating educational materials about these new drugs. Yet for biosimilars to truly get a foothold in the pharmaceutical market, the FDA must continue to support increased outreach to patients.
Our 2019 survey showed that 65% of women would probably use affordable medicines if they were able to access them. By building confidence about the cost and safety of biosimilars and their equivalence to biologics, consumers may start demanding that more of these drugs make it to market.
Women can take matters into their own hands by asking their healthcare providers for information about biosimilars, such as what they know about biosimilars, whether there's a biosimilar to use instead of the medicine they're currently prescribed for their condition, and what their healthcare provider knows about the research that demonstrates the safety and efficacy of biosimilars.
It's important for the FDA to reauthorize the BsUFA. It will not only provide resources to review new biosimilars, it will also allow the FDA to create accessible and understandable educational campaigns to answer questions like these.
I suspect the number of people able to attain biosimilars — especially women living with chronic conditions — would dramatically increase as more people learn how biosimilars could improve their lives.